FacebookInstagramTwitter
mission.pakistan@ties.itu.int
56, rue Moillebeau 1209, Genève0041(0)22 749 19 30
Search
Permanent Mission of Pakistan to the United Nations, GenevaPermanent Mission of Pakistan to the United Nations, Geneva
Permanent Mission of Pakistan to the United Nations, Geneva
Unity, Faith & Disciplene

"Our foreign policy is
one of friendliness and
goodwill towards all
the nations of the world"
~ Quaid-e-Azam
Muhammad Ali Jinnah
(The Founding Father
of Pakistan)

  • Home
  • Profiles
    • President
    • Prime Minister
    • Foreign Minister
    • Foreign Secretary
    • Permanent Representative
  • Mission
  • Events
    • Upcoming Events
    • Events Archive
      • 14th August 2017
  • Opportunities
  • Statements
    • Statements (2005-16)
    • Human Rights
      • Right of Reply
      • 39th HRC session
      • 38th HRC Session
      • 37th HRC session
      • 36th HRC session
      • 35th HRC session
      • 34th HRC session
      • 33rd HRC session
      • Item 2
      • Item 3
      • Item 4
      • Item 5
      • Item 6
      • item 7
      • Item 8
      • Item 9
      • item 10
      • Climate Change and HR
      • Adequate housing
      • Access to Medicines
      • Cultural Rights
      • Access to water and sanitation
      • Death Penalty
      • Education
      • Environment
      • Foreign debt
      • Forum on HR, Democracy&Rule of Law
      • Freedom of Religion or Belief
      • Human Rights Defenders
      • Maternal Mortality
      • Minority Forum
      • Older Persons
      • Peacebuilding
      • Persons with disabilities
      • Racism & Hate Speech
      • Report of UNHC
      • right to development
        • 18th session of IGWG on RtD
      • OIC
        • OIC resolutions on Kashmir
    • UNCTAD
    • Kashmir
    • OIC
    • WHO
      • DG WHO election
      • Dr. Sania Nishtar
    • WIPO
    • UNHCR
    • Disarmament
      • Conference on Disarmament
      • First Committee
      • CCW
  • News
  • Explore Pakistan
    • Explore Pakistan- Main Page
    • Pakistan Blog
    • Tourism
  • Kashmir
    • Kashmir – Main Page
    • Kashmir Blog
    • Kashmir News
    • Kashmir- Pictorial View
  • Contact
Menu back  
January 26, 2016Leave a commentConference on Disarmament, Disarmament, Statements

Statement by Ambassador Tehmina Janjua, Permanent Representative of Pakistan – Conference on Disarmament – Plenary Meeting, 26 January 2016

 

mam-tehminaMr. President,

Congratulations on assuming the Presidency of the CD. I assure you of my delegation’s full support and cooperation. We are pleased to be working with you as part of the CD’s six Presidents for 2016 and look forward to a fruitful and substantive CD session this year.  

We appreciate the excellent manner in which the outgoing President, Ambassador Dell Higgie of New Zealand, conducted the work of the CD including on the finalization of the CD’s report and the consensus adoption of the UNGA resolution on the report of the CD.   

We welcome Mr. Kim Won-soo, UN High Representative for Disarmament Affairs, for being here today. I would also like to thank Mr. Michael Moller, Secretary General of the CD, and his staff, including Mr. Marco Kalbusch, for the excellent secretarial support provided to the Conference. We also welcome CD’s new Deputy Secretary General, Ms. Mary Soliman, and wish her all the best as she takes up her new post.

Mr. President,

            I am taking the floor today for the first time as the Permanent Representative of Pakistan to the UN and other International Organizations based in Geneva and Ambassador to the CD. I consider it an honour to represent my country in the CD and look forward to working with all fellow members of the Conference in the years ahead.    

Pakistan attaches very high importance to the work of the CD and considers it to be a unique and unparalleled forum. As the world’s single multilateral disarmament negotiating body, it is an integral and vital part of the UN disarmament machinery that needs to be preserved and strengthened.

Lately the CD has been the target of some misguided criticism. We understand and share the frustration emanating from the lack of progress on nuclear disarmament – the raison d’etre of the CD – which is a direct cause for most of the criticism. We, however, also realize that the CD does not operate in a vacuum. The CD is a reflection of the prevailing strategic realities. Simply condemning the CD, or trying to find ways around it, only amounts to addressing the symptoms without tackling the root causes.  

The challenges facing the international disarmament agenda and the machinery are neither exclusive to the CD nor new. Other parts of the disarmament machinery confront similar difficulties. The UNDC has not been able to agree on any recommendations for more than a decade and half.   

As long as the noble quest for attaining equal and undiminished security for all states is trumped by hegemonic designs at the regional and global levels, real headway will continue to elude us. Politically motivated, discriminatory revisionism of the global nuclear order will continue to stand in the way of genuine progress. We have to reconcile with the reality that discriminatory approaches and discriminatory treaties are a thing of the past and are doomed to fail in the contemporary environment. It is highly unrealistic to aspire for absolute security and unrestrained freedom of action for oneself, while expecting others to compromise on their peaceful existence by circumscribing their legitimate security interests.   

It is only the CD where all militarily significant states participate on an equal footing and are able to protect their vital security interests under the consensus rule. The progress might be slow, and results few and far between, but the panacea for revitalizing the global disarmament agenda neither lies in abandoning the CD, nor in the pursuance of inequitable treaties that apply disproportionately to one or two states only. Real breakthrough can only be achieved by exercising genuine political will to cooperatively advance the shared goals of international peace and security, and disarmament, on a non-discriminatory and equitable basis. Progress in the CD would follow automatically.     

Unfortunately, the situation in the CD today is such that there is no consensus on the commencement of negotiations on any issue on the CD’s agenda. In recent years some States have taken upon themselves to shift the goal post in terms of international security priorities. Their efforts to project FMCT as the “new” priority and the only “ripe” issue contradict ground realties. The fact is that for a vast majority of States, nuclear disarmament remains the highest priority on the international security agenda. Despite equivocation by some nuclear weapon states, the sheer number of General Assembly resolutions on this issue, over decades, speaks for itself.

Among the four core issues, while the vast majority supports substantive work on the over-ripe issues of Nuclear Disarmament, Negative Security Assurances (NSAs), and the Prevention of an Arms Race in Outer Space (PAROS), certain powers are only prepared to advance a partial non-proliferation measure in the CD in the form of a Fissile Material Cut-off Treaty (FMCT). In order to retain their respective strategic advantages, they are not willing to include existing stocks of fissile materials in the treaty’s negotiating mandate. A treaty that does not address the asymmetry in fissile material stocks, while being completely cost-free for these powers, would adversely affect Pakistan’s vital security interests. Pakistan does not have any room for entertaining any ambiguities on this account. We need complete clarity.

Our Working Paper on Elements of a Fissile Material Treaty, outlining concrete proposals for dealing with existing stocks, contained in document CD/2036 of 21 August 2015, remains on the table.

Mr. President,

While negotiations in the CD have been stymied for one reason or the other, the CD has also been prevented from carrying out substantive discussions on the core issues. Furthermore, the CD has also been denied the opportunity to discuss new issues, beyond the four core issues, that are of direct concern to international peace and security such as Cyber Security, new types of destabilizing weapon systems, Lethal Autonomous Weapons Systems, etcetera.

As witnessed during the last two sessions of the CD in 2014 and 2015, informal in-depth discussions held under the CD’s Schedule of Activities were of great value and substance. We see no reason why such discussions cannot take place in a formal setting, on all agenda items, allowing the possibility to raise and discuss contemporary issues outside the four core issues as well. In case formal discussions are not possible, a Schedule of Activities providing for informal discussions on all agenda items would be highly useful and must be pursued. We seek your leadership in this regard.    

Mr. President,

In addition to the Schedule of Activities, we also saw merit in the Informal Working Group (IWG) mandated to produce a Programme of Work during the last three CD sessions. It allowed the opportunity for all states to openly discuss the various options and to arrive at an acceptable compromise in a transparent manner. The IWG has not been able to achieve any big breakthrough, but the consensus adoption of the IWG’s report last year was a significant achievement. It was a tribute to the dedication and diplomatic skills of the last IWG Chair, Ambassador Kairamo of Finland. We need to build on that success and explore further incremental progress through the re-establishment of the IWG with a similar mandate again this year.  

We acknowledge and recognize the responsibility of the CD President, in accordance with Rule 29 of the Rules of Procedure, to draw up a Programme of Work for consideration and adoption by the Conference. But we also recognize the daunting nature of this task and therefore feel that, for the time being, this responsibility can be delegated to the IWG to search for a consensus-based formula.

Such a dual-track approach whereby the CD is engaged in formal or informal discussions on all agenda items, coupled with parallel efforts to search for a consensus-based Programme of Work, not only offers the best prospects for progress, but also the best manner for utilizing the available time productively.

Let me hasten to emphasize that my delegation is only promoting this so-called dual track approach as a practical and pragmatic step. This is notwithstanding our readiness to join negotiations in the CD on Nuclear Disarmament, Negative Security Assurances (NSAs), and the Prevention of an Arms Race in Outer Space (PAROS), as well as on other issues outside the four core issues such as Cyber Security, new types of destabilizing weapon systems, and Lethal Autonomous Weapons Systems.

We also stand ready to join efforts in the CD for arriving at a new negotiating mandate for a Fissile Material Treaty (FMT) that addresses the asymmetry in fissile material stockpiles, and contributes to the goals of both disarmament and non-proliferation. The proposal that has been recently put forward by one member state for a revised FMT negotiating mandate, regrettably, does not meet these conditions and is therefore not acceptable to my delegation.       

Mr. President, I would like to underscore that you will always find my delegation as an active and constructive participant in the work of the CD. Despite all our frustrations and disappointments, we, collectively, simply cannot give up on the CD. The lure of duplicating the CD’s work in some other forum outside the CD with the aim of seeking progress on a non-consensual basis might seem to be an attractive shortcut, but will eventually prove to be a mirage. It will forever lack the legitimacy that is accorded to a product of the CD. The highly ill-conceived Group of Governmental Experts (GGE) on FMCT that will never be able to get such an endorsement is a case in point.

The exclusion or non-participation of key stakeholders that are directly affected by an arms control, non-proliferation or disarmament related process seriously undermines such processes. However painstaking and time-consuming, there is no shortcut to building consensus-based, cooperative and non-discriminatory approaches that lead to equal and undiminished security for all.     

I thank you, Mr. President.

Share on Facebook Share
Share on TwitterTweet
Share on Google Plus Share
Share on Pinterest Share
Share on LinkedIn Share
Share on Digg Share
Related posts
42nd SESSION OF THE HUMAN RIGHTS COUNCIL – Agenda Item 2 – Interactive Dialogue with the High Commissioner for Human Rights – Tuesday, 10 September 2019
September 10, 2019
Second Session of the CCW Group of Governmental Experts (GGE) on Lethal Autonomous Weapons Systems, 27-31 August 2018 Agenda item 6(d): Possible options for addressing the humanitarian and international security challenges posed by emerging technologies in the area of LAWS in the context of the objectives and purposes of the Convention without prejudging policy outcomes and taking into account past, present and future proposals (29 August 2018) Statement by PAKISTAN
August 29, 2018
Second Session of the CCW Group of Governmental Experts (GGE) on Lethal Autonomous Weapons Systems, 27-31 August 2018 Agenda item 6(b): Further consideration of the human element in the use of lethal force; aspects of human-machine interaction in the development, deployment and use of emerging technologies in the area of lethal autonomous weapons systems (28 August 2018) Statement by PAKISTAN (Delivered by Usman Jadoon, Counsellor)
August 28, 2018
Conference on Disarmament Plenary Meeting, 28 August 2018 Statement by Ambassador Farukh Amil Permanent Representative of Pakistan
August 28, 2018
Conference on Disarmament Plenary Meeting (7 August 2018) Statement by Ambassador Farukh Amil Permanent Representative of Pakistan
August 7, 2018
Conference on Disarmament (CD), Subsidiary Body 1 (Cessation of the Nuclear Arms Race and Nuclear Disarmament) (2 August 2018 – morning session) Statement by Pakistan Delegation (Delivered by Usman Jadoon, Counsellor)
August 2, 2018
Conference on Disarmament (CD), Subsidiary Body 1 (Cessation of the Nuclear Arms Race and Nuclear Disarmament) (2 August 2018 – afternoon session) Statement by Pakistan Delegation (Delivered by Usman Jadoon, Counsellor)
August 2, 2018
Conference on Disarmament (CD), Subsidiary Body 2 (Prevention of nuclear war, including all related matters) (29 June 2018) Statement by Ambassador Farukh Amil Permanent Representative of Pakistan
June 29, 2018
Conference on Disarmament (CD), Subsidiary Body 2 (Prevention of nuclear war, including all related matters) (28 June 2018) Statement by Pakistan on the Issue of Verification (Delivered by Usman Jadoon, Counsellor)
June 28, 2018
Conference on Disarmament (CD), Subsidiary Body 2 (Prevention of nuclear war, including all related matters) (28 June 2018) “Measures Including Legal Instruments” Statement by Pakistan Delegation (Delivered by Usman Jadoon, Counsellor)
June 28, 2018
Conference on Disarmament (CD), Subsidiary Body 2 (Prevention of nuclear war, including all related matters) (27 June 2018) Statement by Pakistan on the Issue of Scope (Delivered by Usman Jadoon, Counsellor)
June 27, 2018
Conference on Disarmament (CD), Subsidiary Body 1 (Cessation of the Nuclear Arms Race and Nuclear Disarmament) (25 June 2018) Statement by Ambassador Farukh Amil Permanent Representative of Pakistan
June 25, 2018
Leave Comment

Cancel reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.

Follow @PakUNgeneva
Categories of Posts
  • Conference on Disarmament(51)
  • Disarmament(61)
  • Human Rights(283)
  • Kashmir(24)
  • OIC(61)
  • Right of Reply(24)
  • UNCTAD(22)
  • UNHCR(5)
  • WHO(3)
  • WIPO(1)

Latest News & Views

  • Remarks by Tahir Hussain Andrabi, Acting Permanent Representative of Pakistan – Agenda Item-2: Interactive Dialogue with the High Commissioner for Human Rightsat 41st Session of the Human Rights Council (25 June 2019, Geneva)
    June 25, 2019 , human rights
  • Message by Foreign Minister of Pakistan on International Women’s Day 08 March 2019
    March 8, 2019
  • Statement by Qazi Saleem, Second Secretary, Permanent Mission of Pakistan to the United Nations during the Clustered Interactive Dialogue with the Special Rapporteur on the right to privacy and Special Rapporteur in the field of Cultural Rights (40th Session of Human Rights Council), 1 March 2019
    March 1, 2019 , human rights
Latest Posts
  • 70th Session of the Executive Committee of UNHCR – Statement by Mr. Shehryar Afridi, Minister of State for States and Frontier Regions (SARFON) (07 October, 2019)
    October 7, 2019
  • No title
    September 24, 2019
  • Permanent Mission of Pakistan to the United Nations – Right of Reply – Agenda Item-8 – 42nd Session of the Human Rights Council – 23 September 2019
    September 23, 2019
Useful Links
  • Commerce
  • Tourism
  • Culture & Heritage
  • Cabinet
  • State Bank of Pakistan
  • Information Ministry
  • TDAP
Explore Pakistan
Permanent Mission of Pakistan to the United Nations, Geneva
All rights reserved with Government of Pakistan